|
It's no
exaggeration to say that it came as a shock, a numbing body-slam to
the nervous system.
But then what would you feel if you opened a daily newspaper and discovered
you had been all but directly accused of molesting children?
The Smiths know: they feel reviled... and confused.
Only a few days before, they had finished a session for The David
Jensen Show. Their first single "Hand In Glove" had achieved positive
press criticism, and they'd hoped that their follow-up, "Reel Around
The Fountain," would build on that success. Everything was great.
Morrissey was singing in excelsis, Johnny Marr's guitars and harmonica
were precisely etching the very face of the session, and Mike Joyce
and Andy Rourke had lifted the rhythm of their drums and bass until
it hammered at the ceiling and crashed to the floor. On a temporal stage
The Smiths know it's Heaven when they're up there.
And they smile with devilish intent.
And as for notoriety... well one is thrashing a bouquet of golden daffodils
onstage anything more than poetic license? Or is the sensitive profile
of a naked man on a single sleeve aspiring to subversion?
But two
weeks ago, The Sun ran a news story by their showbiz correspondent,
Nick Ferari, which alleged that BBC Radio chiefs were to hold an emergency
meeting to decide whether a "song about molesting" should be broadcast
on The David Jensen Show.
According to the garbled and inaccurate article the track in question
was entitled "Handsome Devil" - and it contained "clear references to
picking up kids for sexual kicks". When questioned by The Sun
about his "controversial lyrics" Morrissey is reported as saying "I
don't feel immoral singing about molesting children."
What man would sign his own death warrant thus? That "Handsome Devil"
had not been recorded for the session did not affect the paper's verdict
on the band; nor did any of the other flagrant fabrications (including
the interview). What did matter was the crash of breaking glass as a
thousand lonely housewives dropped their milk-bottles...
Following the spot-the-pervert accusations in The Sun, Sounds
ran a damning indictment of the band in their gossip colum Jaws
- penned by none other than Garry Bushell, a fervent enemy of the Mancunian
quartet.
Bushell has been blamed by The Smiths' record company, Rough Trade,
for giving The Sun its derogatory and misleading information
in the first place. Bushell, when asked, denied such claims and in turn
accused his arch rival Dave McCullough - who is an ardent fan of The
Smiths - of mis-interpreting the band's lyrics in a feature that he
wrote: thus instigating the whole story.
As Morrissey says: "It's really their affair and we're just bait."
Since then Rough Trade's solicitor has dispatched letters to both The
Sun and Sounds asking for a retraction. If no such retraction
and apology appears legal action is likely to be taken.
So there,
condensed and shrink-wrapped, you have the none too pleasant tale of
how The Smiths, a wan and wonderful phenomena from Manchester, crossed
the great divide between independent fame and National infamy. How do
they feel?
"Well, we're still in a wild state of shock," an ashen Morrissey
replies. "We were completely aghast at The Sun allegations,
and even more so by Sounds. We really can't emphasize how much
it upset us because obviously it was completely fabricated," he claims.
"I did an interview with a person called Nick Ferari - and what developed
in print was just a total travesty of the actual interview.
It couldn't possibly be more diverse in opinion.
"To me it's about somebody else, they're writing about another group...
it's so strange. It's tragically depressing...
"Quite obviously we don't condone child molesting or anything that vaguely
resembles it. What more can be said?"
What more indeed? Since the deplorable rape of a six year old Brighton
boy, The Sun has picked up a new word for its meagre vocabulary:
"paedophilia". And now that word has been used as a wedge to open the
door for an onslaught on anything that doesn't fit into its own Moral
Bible.
Paranoia or persecution? If this strikes as a symptom of the former,
then take heed: it's as likely to be a concrete encroachment from the
latter. Nothing, not even Bingo, can boost a reactionary tabloid's sales
like a jingoistic war cry or a MacArthurian witch hunt. Are we so pathetic
as to believe that Fleet Street's crusaders march out with unsoiled
hands?
As guitarist Johnny Marr states: "It seems on the surface of it as
the obvious hatchet job against a new, rising band who are getting a
certain amount of publicity. But on every level the whole thing's got
completely out of hand... and it's affecting us personally now.
"I've got a younger brother who is 11, who on the day it was in The
Sun went to school and was hassled by kids, hassled by teachers."
Morrissey continues: "It's really difficult to conceive such... savage
critique. Because it's not just 'bad' it's about as bad as you could
possibly, humanly get it. And there is so much hatred from Sounds..."
Wasn't it possible that the Sounds piece was a joke?
"Well, they might be 'jokes' but they're really not funny," Morrissey
soberly replies.
"I'm sure," says Johnny, "that if the mother of the young
lad in Brighton was to read the statement concerning us, or anybody
who has strong feelings about the case, then they're not going to see
it as a joke.
"I think if there is that ambiguity there, then it was there with that
purpose: for whoever wants to believe it. I think there are more people
that are gonna take it seriously than do regard it as a joke. It's more
than ambiguous."
And The Sun's piece?
Morrissey: "It's quite laughable coming from a newspaper like The
Sun - which is so obviously obsessed with every aspect of sex.
So it's all really a total travesty of human nature that it's thrown
at us, such sensitive and relatively restrained people. I live a life
that befits a priest virtually and to be splashed about as a child molester...
it's just unutterable."
However
fatuous and fantastic The Sun article was, it did succeed in
its dirtying The Smiths name (for reasons unknown). It also ensured
that the session, which wasn't being "investigated," was censored
and that a six minute version of "Reel Around The Fountain" was removed.
According to Mike Hawkes, the producer for David Jensen's show, the
specially commissioned track was removed purely as a precautionary measure.
As for the article itself, all the BBC press office could offer was
that veritable cliche, "The Sun got it wrong again".
Unfortunately Morrissey was saddened to hear that Aunty had decided
to drop the track because "The record itself is protection because
of its innocence.
"Curiously though, at the end of the day, the BBC did pledge their allegiance
to us. So I think that's more important than anything else."
And for The Smiths that's probably true. The BBC have not banned their
material and plan to play the single when it is released. In fact, their
sad treatment at the hands of the Bingo Barons and other writers of
prurient pap may well by the foundations for their success.
What obviously attracted the flies to the meat was Morrissey's blunt
but beautiful lyrical style. For many of the songs the leit-motif
is that of an ageless, genderless love; and an unrequited love at that.
Unfortunately the nebulosity of each song's protagonist does inject
a certain sense of ambiguity into the storyline. And that was a red
flag to The Sun...
Morrissey: "It's completely taken out of context - but it depends
on where the individual's mind lies. If you want to read something in
particular lyrics you will - whether it's there or not."
What - "A boy in the bush is worth two in the hand, I think I can
help you get thru your exams"?
Morrissey: "Yes. If you read the rest of the lyrics then it completely
complies. And the message of the song is to forget the cultivation of
the brain and to concentrate on the cultivation of the body. A boy
in the bush... is addressed to a scholar. There's more to life
than books you know, but not much more - that is the essence of
the song...
"So you can just take it and stick it in an article about child-molesting
and it will make absolutely perfect sense. But you can do that with
anybody. You can do it with Abba."
To meet
Morrissey is to meet somebody of unsettling calm. Broad, square and
white, he is imbued with the same sense of enormity that marks the great
men of religion. He is - in varying measures - bashful, sarcastic and
serene. Thankfully his often caustic wit and his elastic ego are countered
by his zealotry and passion. At times he is both Missionary and heathen.
And at times he writes the best love songs since The Buzzcocks.
His partner in contempt of crime is Johnny Marr, a nervous, effusive
creature who hides behind dark glasses and plays great scores.
"I live a saintly life," Morrissey laughs. "He lives a devilish
life. And the combination is wonderful. Perfect."
"Hand
in glove/The sun shines out of our behinds"
- "Hand In Glove"
Of course
to hear is to believe. And with their debut Troy Tate-produced LP set
for imminent release, more will hear and more will believe.
An American distribution arrangement has been agreed with WEA and their
hopeful conquest of the Atlantic shores will come as no surprise. Though,
no doubt, the question of their lyrical content will surely be mooted
by that country's more puritan forces.
Not that it matters.
Morrissey: "I'm certainly not going to change the way I write because
I think it's essential. If I have to be accused of anything, it's because
I write strongly and I write very openly from the heart... which is
something people aren't really used to. They're used to a very strict,
regimented style - and if you are get too personal, and I don't mean
offensively personal but just too close then it's
what a 'strange' person, let's get him on the guillotine."
Will that hinder your commercial success?
"No," he continues vigorously. "At the end of the day the
truth comes through and we shall find the highest success.
"Our egos are not so fragile that we are shattered by anything some
mini-streamroller at Sounds could write. We're not that fey
- good grief. Neither were we really affected that much by The Sun.
It's just the rest of the world you have to worry about - you have to
take their feelings into consideration - which is a great burden.
"It really proves that you don't have as much control over your destiny
in this business as you think you do. There are people who like you
and there are people who hate you. So why should you give the people
that hate you precedence? Really we should stamp on it. It's history
already."
Throughout, Morrissey speaks of himself and his band in elevated tones
almost as if he holds a certain disdain for the soiled and grubby cameo
that the rest of us portray as life. He sees the body as the Taoist
temple of the mind: he doesn't drink, he doesn't smoke and he doesn't
swear. Above all, he is celibate and has been for a long time. He sees
himself as more than a rival to Cliff Richard.
Yet undeniably his penmanship constantly returns to the throes of Love:
in all its tempered glory. And through it comes the weakness and forced
purity that underlies the solidity of his work. When he sings his voice
is that of an angel in purgatory. And his stigma is the anguish of the
damned.
"You
can pin and mount me like a butterfly But take me to the heaven of your
bed Was something that you never said"
- "Reel Around The Fountain"
Are you
removed from love?
Morrissey: "I'm physically removed, but there are so many aspects
of it. Much of what I write about is unrequited.
"I feel that I do have a unique view of it because obviously it dominates
every individual's life - which I've observed for quite a time. I feel
I have a particular insight, which sounds terribly pompous and terribly
ostentatious. It's funny though that most people that get enchained
to the idea of 'absolute love' are usually totally irresponsible and
self-deprecating individuals."
Isn't that a sterile view of love?
"No. I'm not a bitter and twisted individual with a whip crashing
down on lovers in the park!"
All in all it smacks of an almost religious devotion to an ideal; an
ideal that is clouded somewhat by its own grandeur but is basically
akin to the awe-inspring moments that make the Bunnymen so crystalline
in their magnificence.
Yet Ian Mac is firmly rooted in his own background and belief, and therefore
bows to the world and possesses humility. Morrissey, on the other hand,
is quite content to let his lofty aspirations get the better of him
and as such fails to win on a human level. His songs are all from a
birds-eye view and until he admits to his own weaknesses the best part
of The Smiths' creed will remain frozen and other-worldly.
Is this man, you ask, an egotist?
Morrissey: "It's not really ego. If you have something and you know
that you're good why be shy and hide behind the curtains? There's no
point..."
What does all of this mean to you?
"It's more essential to me than breathing - it's more natural to
me than breathing. I don't know why I'm here, it's like being hurled
on an escalator and you go up and you don't have any say in the matter.
That's all really...
"The whole thing really is a matter of life and death. And that's how
serious we are..."
Aren't you worried that people might not take you seriously?
"Some people won't, some people will and the fact that some people
will and do already, means that it's been valuable, it's been worthwhile..."
Do you feel that you have to be a threat to be successful?
"No, not in the least. If the whole threat thing means you have a
brain and you use it, then we're a threat. But if it means anything
other than that, well, I don't really see how we're dangerous in any
way. I don't think we'll disturb anybody - and I don't think it's coy
to say that."
In less
than a year The Smiths have forged a resilient beauty. Their candour,
their confidence, has blossomed into the most melodic of spiritual sounds.
There is a rawness in their music that belies their musical age; a fresh,
ethereal ability that captures more than just the routine of "making"
good songs. In a great Smiths song there is an overview that simply
towers above the congregating mortals in the popforum. And for that
I'll say a little prayer.
"The good people laugh/Yes, we may be hidden by rags/But we have
something that they'll never have"
- "Hand In Glove".
The
above article was originally published in the September 24, 1983 issue
of New Musical Express. Reprinted without permission
for non-profit use only.
|